Rights Don’t Actually Exist, Only Force (Wilson vs 5) — Wilson borrows anti-realism to level secular rights, then needs Christian truth to win — a tiebreaker the leveling forbids and he never argues; “your own form of Sharia law”
Christians Have as Much Right to Rule as Secularists (Wilson vs 5) — the Sharia reciprocity test fired five times; turned the right way it concedes that imposition owes the governed an accessible reason; “because the Bible” fails it, “because it prevents harm X” passes — symmetrically
Do Atheists Benefit from Living in a Christian Society? (Wilson vs 5) — Christian ethics as time-tested compressed wisdom (it works “even corrupted”); the benefit is decoupled from the theology being true → credit the carrier, decompress the norm, don’t adopt the creed by reflex
Did Christian Societies Actually Outperform? — the testable steelman isn’t “Christianity is powerful” but the Western-Church kin-network dissolution (cousin-marriage ban → WEIRD individualism); Orthodox/Catholic/Protestant variance is the experiment, not noise
Force Doctrine — The Theory — the Euthyphro correction (God = Author of natures, not truth-maker of duties) is more Thomist than Wilson; religion as a time-tested structural reservoir; “the righteous will prevail” = “structure wins,” relabeled
The Absoluteness Claim — the case against “the laws of logic are absolute, therefore God” made without Gödel or self-reference; unbundles the three laws into a tautology, a bookkeeping rule, and one empirical bet
The Consistency Defeater — never claim his system is inconsistent — claim a proof is worth only your confidence the system never contradicts itself; the printing machine, the parity move, and the substantive-or-safe fork
Malpass vs Dyer — TAG and the Laws of Logic — the 2019 technical version: concedes alternative formal systems, claims Gödel as an ally, denies being an Aristotelian; the later corpus drops every technical thread